LEG 320 Week 7 Assignment 2: Criminal Defenses and Criminal Punishments : Essay Fountain

LEG 320 Week 7 Assignment 2: Criminal Defenses and Criminal Punishments

profilestudent2354

Home>Law homework help

Assignment 2: Criminal Defenses and Criminal Punishments
Due Week 7 and worth 170 points

It is common knowledge that two controversial issues in the American legal system are the types of criminal defenses and the manner of criminal punishment. In this assignment, you will explore both in their various forms.

Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research the types of criminal defenses and the manner of criminal punishment.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

  1. Specify the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force. Next, evaluate the level of objectivity inherent in each point that you have specified.
  2. Determine the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and stand your ground types of criminal defenses. Justify the validity of each, and provide one (1) example of each to support your response.
  3. Analyze the overall role that double jeopardy clause plays within the trial system. Next, evaluate the general level of fairness of double jeopardy to the defense. Provide a rationale to support your response.
  4. Specify the basic features of adversarial system. Next, support or critique the value of the adversarial system within the criminal law system in the United States. Justify your response.
  5. Argue for or against the right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Provide a rationale to support your response.
  6. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment.

 

Points: 170

Assignment 2: Criminal Defenses and Criminal Punishments

Criteria

 

Unacceptable
Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D

 

Fair
70-79% C

 

Proficient
80-89% B

 

Exemplary
90-100% A

1. Specify the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force. Next, evaluate the level of objectivity inherent in each point that you have specified.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely specified the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force. Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the level of objectivity inherent in each point that you have specified.

Insufficiently specified the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force. Insufficiently evaluated the level of objectivity inherent in each point that you have specified.

Partially specified the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force. Partially evaluated the level of objectivity inherent in each point that you have specified.

Satisfactorily specified the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force. Satisfactorily evaluated the level of objectivity inherent in each point that you have specified.

Thoroughly specified the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force. Thoroughly evaluated the level of objectivity inherent in each point that you have specified.

2. Determine the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and stand your ground types of criminal defenses.  Justify the validity of each, and provide one (1) example of each to support your response.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and stand your ground types of criminal defenses. Did not submit or incompletely justified the validity of each, and did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) example of each to support your response.

Insufficiently determined the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and stand your ground types of criminal defenses.  Insufficiently justified the validity of each, and insufficiently provided one (1) example of each to support your response.

Partially determined the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and stand your ground types of criminal defenses.  Partially justified the validity of each, and partially provided one (1) example of each to support your response.

Satisfactorily determined the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and stand your ground types of criminal defenses. Satisfactorily justified the validity of each, and satisfactorily provided one (1) example of each to support your response.

Thoroughly determined the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and stand your ground types of criminal defenses.  Thoroughly justified the validity of each, and thoroughly provided one (1) example of each to support your response.

3. Analyze the overall role that double jeopardy clause plays within the trial system. Next, evaluate the general level of fairness of double jeopardy to the defense. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the overall role that double jeopardy clause plays within the trial system. Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the general level of fairness of double jeopardy to the defense. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.

Insufficiently analyzed the overall role that double jeopardy clause plays within the trial system. Insufficiently evaluated the general level of fairness of double jeopardy to the defense. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.

Partially analyzed the overall role that double jeopardy clause plays within the trial system. Partially evaluated the general level of fairness of double jeopardy to the defense. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.

Satisfactorily analyzed the overall role that double jeopardy clause plays within the trial system. Satisfactorily evaluated the general level of fairness of double jeopardy to the defense. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.

Thoroughly analyzed the overall role that double jeopardy clause plays within the trial system. Thoroughly evaluated the general level of fairness of double jeopardy to the defense. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.

4. Specify the basic features of adversarial system. Next, support or critique the value of the adversarial system within the criminal law system in the United States. Justify your response.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely specified the basic features of adversarial system. Did not submit or incompletely supported or critiqued the value of the adversarial system within the criminal law system in the United States. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Insufficiently specified the basic features of adversarial system. Insufficiently supported or critiqued the value of the adversarial system within the criminal law system in the United States. Insufficiently justified your response.

Partially specified the basic features of adversarial system. Partially supported or critiqued the value of the adversarial system within the criminal law system in the United States. Partially justified your response.

Satisfactorily specified the basic features of adversarial system. Satisfactorily supported or critiqued the value of the adversarial system within the criminal law system in the United States. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Thoroughly specified the basic features of adversarial system. Thoroughly supported or critiqued the value of the adversarial system within the criminal law system in the United States. Thoroughly justified your response.

5. Argue for or against the right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely argued for or against the right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.

Insufficiently argued for or against the right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.

Partially argued for or against the right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.

Satisfactorily argued for or against the right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.

Thoroughly argued for or against the right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.

6. 3 references
Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

    • 4 years ago


    • 3

    Report Issue
    Answer(1)

    Purchase the answer to view it

    NOT RATED
    • attachment

      criminal_defenses_and_criminal_punishments.docx


    Bids(1)

    • Yazmin Grey PhD
    other Questions(10)

    • Searching for a Clinical Topic in the Literature
    • Eng
    • Natural capitalism
    • BSHS 406 Week 2 Gender Class and Race
    • summary
    • ONE PAGE
    • HOUR
    • Find five solutions for the linear equation 3x-5y=15,and plot the solutions as points on a coordinate plane.
    • calculus 2 homework
    • Triange 7-11
    Order a unique copy of this paper
    (550 words)

    Approximate price: $22

    Basic features
    • Free title page and bibliography
    • Unlimited revisions
    • Plagiarism-free guarantee
    • Money-back guarantee
    • 24/7 support
    On-demand options
    • Writer’s samples
    • Part-by-part delivery
    • Overnight delivery
    • Copies of used sources
    • Expert Proofreading
    Paper format
    • 275 words per page
    • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
    • Double line spacing
    • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

    Our guarantees

    Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
    That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

    Money-back guarantee

    You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

    Read more

    Zero-plagiarism guarantee

    Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

    Read more

    Free-revision policy

    Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

    Read more

    Privacy policy

    Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

    Read more

    Fair-cooperation guarantee

    By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

    Read more

    Calculate the price of your order

    550 words
    We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
    Total price:
    $26
    The price is based on these factors:
    Academic level
    Number of pages
    Urgency
    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code: THANKYOUPlace Order
    +